Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Torres et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 9:2023cv80662
Plaintiff:
Fabio Torres and Claribel Olivares
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Torres et al v. National Specialty Insurance Co.
as 9:2023cv80647
Plaintiff:
Fabio Torres and Claribel Olivares
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Pereira v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 0:2022cv61522
Plaintiff:
Fabio Pereira
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
CASTELLANOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14544
Plaintiff:
FABIO ANDRES CASTELLANOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv14044
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and FABIO RIANO
Plaintiff:
FABIO RIANO, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Galarce v. Parison, Inc.
as 1:2022cv22112
Plaintiff:
Fabio Galarce
Defendant:
Parison, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lobo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low et al
as 5:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Fabio Porfirio Lobo
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
