Cases 11 - 20 of 49
GAY et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04573
Plaintiff:
RANDALL J. GAY, JR. , DESHA GAY , WARREN CAPONE and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION, RIDDELL SPORTS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodi v. Williams et al
as 4:2012cv01379
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodi
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Williams and Gus Genetti of Williamsport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
BRENT BOYD, MARGENE ADKINS, FRED ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPYRIDON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59019
Plaintiff:
GUS A. SPYRIDON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GOUMENEAS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55767
Plaintiff:
GUS B GOUMENEAS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEAF v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56843
Plaintiff:
GUS LEAF
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MORAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50822
Plaintiff:
GUS R. MORAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44987
Plaintiff:
GUS L. BELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAWRENCE et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62663
Plaintiff:
GUS LAWRENCE and JEAN LAWRENCE
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATES et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv60086
Plaintiff:
GUS BATES and FANNIE BATES
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
