Cases 11 - 20 of 366
Zeigler v. Arietis Health LLC
as 2:2023cv00919
Plaintiff:
Robbin Zeigler
Defendant:
Arietis Health LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission
Davis v. Enhance Health LLC
as 8:2023cv02369
Plaintiff:
Shannan Davis
Defendant:
Enhance Health LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sligh v. Arietis Health, LLC
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Gina Sligh
Defendant:
Arietis Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Frankeberger v. Arietis Health, LLC
as 2:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Eliot Frankeberger
Defendant:
Arietis Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Schafer v. Arietis Health, LLC
as 2:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Danielle Schafer
Defendant:
Arietis Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pinellas County, Florida v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 8:2023cv02153
Plaintiff:
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Evernorth Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vive Health, LLC. v. Stander, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Vive Health, LLC.
Defendant:
Stander, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
v. Connors et al
as 2:2023cv00474
Defendant:
Michael J Connors, ProTouch Marketing, LLC, d/b/a Smart Day Supplements, Woodford Hills, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission
United States of America v. Connors et al
as 2:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael J. Connors, ProTouch Marketing, LLC, d/b/a Smart Day Supplements, Woodford Hills, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
