Cases 11 - 20 of 96
ROBERT PACKER HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv03196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PACKER HOSPITAL, GUTHRIE CORTLAND MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER doing business as OSF SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ANIMAL OUTLOOK v. AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02842
Not Classified By Court:
Animal Outlook, Inc.
Defendant:
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, INC. and DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL OUTLOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT ANTHONY MEDICAL CENTER, SAINT JAMES HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services and XAVIER BECERRA
Petitioner:
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, INGALLS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ANTELOPE VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01678
Plaintiff:
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, DAMERON HOSPITAL, ALHAMBRA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TARZANA PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01509
Plaintiff:
Tarzana Providence Health System, FAYETTE MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE ILLINOIS MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL, ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
Secretary XAVIER BECERRA and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv03231
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, RENOWN HEALTH and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner:
COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS, PHYSICIANS ADVOCACY INSTITUTE, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERATION OF AMERICAN HOSPITALS, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, AMERICA'S ESSENTIAL HOSPITALS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv03123
Plaintiff:
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as SACRED HEART HOSPITAL, ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. ELIZABETH'S HOSPITAL, ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF THE HOSPITAL SISTERS OF THE THIRD ORDER OF ST. FRANCIS doing business as ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv02230
Plaintiff:
HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SWEDISH COVENANT HOSPITAL, WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
