Cases 11 - 20 of 27
HURD v. POLEY et al
as 2:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HURD
Defendant:
MICHAEL POLEY and SERVICE TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Of America v. Anstadt
as 1:2014cv00563
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Hurd Pocklington Anstadt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
TROTTER et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63667
Plaintiff:
LILIAN HURD TROTTER
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52465
Plaintiff:
HAROLD P. HURD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Hurd v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv01852
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Hurd
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HURD v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70898
Plaintiff:
HAROLD P. HURD
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURD et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63713
Plaintiff:
MARTHA N. HURD and NOEL HURD
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HATTABAUGH et al v. AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv62753
Plaintiff:
HERMAN HURD and BRACY HURD
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURD v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv86625
Plaintiff:
NOEL HURD and MARTHA N. HURD
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HURD et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87679
Plaintiff:
HERMAN HURD, HERMAN HURD, BRACY HURD and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
