Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Youssry Botros et al v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2012cv05450
Plaintiff:
Randa Bostros and Youssry Botros
Defendant:
Does, ING Bank FSB and Integrated Lender Services
Saeed Kahen Kashani et al v. GN Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04682
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Does, GN Mortgage LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Farima Kahen Kashani and Saeed Kahen Kashani
Mikels et al v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 2:2012cv01312
Plaintiff:
Marshall-Edward: Mikels and Celine Mikels
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB , Jan Hommen, ING Direct and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ing Bank, FSB v. Pineda et al
as 3:2012cv02418
Plaintiff:
Ing Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Raul Pineda and Graciela Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evelio Castillo et al v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 2:2012cv03734
Plaintiff:
Evelio Castillo and Maria T Castillo
Defendant:
Does, ING Bank FSB and Integrated Lender Services
ING Bank FSB v. Mikels et al
as 2:2012cv00994
Plaintiff:
ING Bank FSB
Defendant:
Marshall E. Mikels and Celine Mikels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ING Bank, FSB v. Gregory Arbib et al
as 2:2012cv01464
Defendant:
Anat Arbib, Adam Arbib, Does I through X, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
ING Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Ilori Ademayowa v. ING Bank FSB et al
as 5:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Ilori Ademayowa
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown Claiming any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in the Property Described in the Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title or any Cloud on Plaintiff's, Does, ING Bank FSB and others
ING Bank FSB v. William H Collins et al
as 2:2012cv00016
Defendant:
William H Collins and Does
Plaintiff:
ING Bank FSB
Larrieu et al v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2011cv06167
Plaintiff:
David E. Larrieu and Deborah Larrieu
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB , Universal Wholesale Financial, Inc. and Creative Escrow Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
