Cases 11 - 16 of 16
J&M, LLC et al v. HARBORLITE DISTRIBUTION CORP.
as 3:2013cv03063
Plaintiff:
J&M, LLC and MOBSHAH GROUP INC.
Defendant:
HARBORLITE DISTRIBUTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MCALLISTER v. J&M HOLDING ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00728
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MCALLISTER
Defendant:
J&M HOLDING ENTERPRISES, INC. , YACHTING REVOLUTION, LTD. , MARC TRACHTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
GORDON PAPER COMPANY, INC. et al v. GORDON et al
as 2:2012cv06021
Plaintiff:
GORDON PAPER COMPANY, INC. and STEVEN GORDON
Defendant:
MARK GORDON , CAMELOT PAPERS, INC. , J&M CUMMING PAPER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
TOBIA et al v. M & A DEVELOPERS LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03149
Plaintiff:
PETER TOBIA and ANNETTE TOBIA
Defendant:
M & A DEVELOPERS LLC, HAND BUILDERS, JW HAND & SONS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
-ES FALOR v. G&S BILLBOARD et al
as 2:2004cv02373
Plaintiff:
GARRY R. FALOR
Defendant:
G&S BILLBOARD , JOHN DOE, CONMACO, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
G&S BILLBOARD , CONMACO, INC. , AMERICAN PILEDRIVING EQUIPMENT, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
CONMACO, INC., JOHN DOE, G&S BILLBOARD and others
Counter_defendant:
G&S BILLBOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
