Cases 11 - 20 of 14,527
Grabe v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05211
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Grabe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2024cv05184
Plaintiff:
Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Longley v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05171
Plaintiff:
Nadine M Longley
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Coleman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05150
Plaintiff:
Ebony M. Coleman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scanlon v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05157
Plaintiff:
Rita Scanlon
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Almuktar v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv05164
Plaintiff:
Desiree Almuktar
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Medina v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01532
Plaintiff:
Nestor Medina
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Felicia Adkins, Dr J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parks v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50238
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Parks
Defendant:
Commissoner Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
