Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Betsey Lebbos, et al v. USDCSAC
as 08-72784
:
In re: BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS, JASON P. GOLD and THOMAS CARTER
Petitioner:
BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS, JASON P. GOLD and THOMAS CARTER
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
LINDA SCHUETTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00912
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00763
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lebbos et al v. Schuette
as 2:2008mc00046
Appellant:
Betsey Warren Lebbos, Jason P. Gold and Thomas Carter
Appellee:
Linda Schuette
Trustee:
Sara L. Kistler
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00503
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00502
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00440
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter, et al v. Schuette
as 08-15349
Debtor:
In re: BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS
Appellant:
THOMAS CARTER
Appellee:
BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS, LINDA SCHUETTE, JUDITH HOLTZE and others
Lebbos, et al v. Schuette
as 08-15347
Debtor:
In re: BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS
Appellant:
BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS
Appellee:
LINDA SCHUETTE, JUDITH HOLTZE, JASON P. GOLD and others
Gold, et al v. Schuette
as 08-15348
Debtor:
In re: BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS
Appellant:
BETSEY WARREN LEBBOS and JASON P. GOLD
Appellee:
LINDA SCHUETTE, JUDITH HOLTZE, THOMAS CARTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
