Cases 11 - 20 of 611
PIERCE et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP
as 2:2011cv67601
Plaintiff:
BERNIS L PIERCE and MARIE PIERCE
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARMER v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67641
Plaintiff:
LAURA H FARMER
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTES v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv67482
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE P. ESTES
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOBGOOD et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67573
Plaintiff:
M.J. HOBGOOD , MARY ANN HOBGOOD , EDWARD A. MASON and others
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TREADWELL et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67646
Plaintiff:
LEON TREADWELL and ETHEL TREADWELL
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORRESTER et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67618
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. FORRESTER and HAZEL C. FORRESTER
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CODAY v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67606
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY V. CODAY
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATTS et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67645
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE WATTS
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WORRELL v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67623
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. WORRELL
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANLEY et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67635
Plaintiff:
COLEY MANLEY and MAMIE LEE MANLEY
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
