Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-11229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
WEBSTER v. DUPONT PINE PRODUCTS LLC
as 5:2014mc00014
Debtor:
HUBERT MOORE LUMBER COMPANY LLC
Plaintiff:
JOY R WEBSTER
Defendant:
DUPONT PINE PRODUCTS LLC
WEBSTER v. DUPONT PINE PRODUCTS LLC
as 7:2014mc00004
Plaintiff:
JOY R WEBSTER
Defendant:
DUPONT PINE PRODUCTS LLC
Debtor:
HUBERT MOORE LUMBER COMPANY LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00054
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company v. Anderson et al
as 5:2010cv00500
Plaintiff:
Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
R Lars Anderson , Foot and Leg Centers of Georgia PC , George Vito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Georgia Department of Revenue v. Webster et al
as 5:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
Georgia Department of Revenue
Defendant:
Joy R. Webster and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Debtor:
Security Bank Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cross Defendant:
Joy R. Webster
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00161
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Newlin v. Winchester
as 4:2009mc00003
Movant:
E. Murray Newlin
Respondent:
James Winchester, James Winchester and Joy R. Webster
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00012
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
