Cases 11 - 19 of 19
KASTURAS v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00322
Plaintiff:
GRACE KASTURAS
Defendant:
KOHL'S CORPORATION, KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., ABC CORP. 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VOLINSKI v. TERVIS TUMBLER COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv07616
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ANN VOLINSKI
Defendant:
TERVIS TUMBLER COMPANY and KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
COYLE et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv04650
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY COYLE and MICHAEL COYLE, SR.
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAMIANO v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
LISA DAMIANO
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. , ABC ENTITIES 1-5 and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BERNSTEIN v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv05454
Plaintiff:
HARRIANN BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., JOHN DOE 1-5 (fictitious entity) and ABC COMPANY 1-5 (fictitious entity)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
PLATT v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03319
Plaintiff:
MARGARET PLATT
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., MILL CREEK MALL LLC, HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FERUCCI et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00471
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE FERUCCI and ANTHONY FERUCCI
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
