Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Kin Interinsurance Network v. Patterson, et al
as 2:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
KIN Interinsurance Network
Defendant:
Earnest Patterson, McClenny, Moseley & Associates, PLLC and McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
KIN Interinsurance Network v. Bowers, et al
as 2:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
KIN Interinsurance Network
Defendant:
Jo An Bowers, McClenny, Moseley & Associates, PLLC and McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
KIN Interinsurance Network v. Coombs, et al.
as 2:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
KIN Interinsurance Network
Defendant:
John Coombs, Amy Coombs, McClenny, Moseley & Associates, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Zito v. KIN Interinsurance Network
as 2:2022cv05219
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Zito
Defendant:
KIN Interinsurance Network
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thomas, et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 2:2022cv04542
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas and Amy Thomas
Defendant:
Kin Interinsurance Network, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and Kin Insurance Network Distributor, LLC
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Raslavich v. Kin Insurance, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN RASLAVICH
Defendant:
KIN INSURANCE, INC. and Kin Interinsurance Network
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brown v. Kin Interinsurance Network
as 5:2022cv04567
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Brown
Defendant:
Kin Interinsurance Network
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chester v. KIN Interinsurance Network
as 2:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
Wendy Chester
Defendant:
KIN Interinsurance Network
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
