Cases 11 - 20 of 254
JEVENS v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60265
Plaintiff:
GERALD JEVENS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., AIRCO, INC./THE BOC GROUP, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VAN RIPER v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60279
Plaintiff:
ROY D. VAN RIPER
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, CHICAGO FIREBRICK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOEN v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60258
Plaintiff:
SANFORD MOEN
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., AIRCO, INC./THE BOC GROUP, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
AKEY v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60286
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. AKEY
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, BF GOODRICH CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BARKER v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60285
Plaintiff:
ARLENE BARKER
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, BF GOODRICH CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GUNDRY v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60290
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GUNDRY
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, C.E THURSTON AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CAMMERS v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60284
Plaintiff:
EARL J. CAMMERS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MATTKE v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60262
Plaintiff:
DONALD MATTKE
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., AIRCO, INC./THE BOC GROUP, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FETTING v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60270
Plaintiff:
ALFRED FETTING
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., INC. AIRCO, BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MANDEL v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv60282
Plaintiff:
HERBERT R. MANDEL
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., INC. AIRCO, BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
