Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Carr v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
John Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Sgt. Laing et al
as 1:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Hernandez
Defendant:
Sgt. Laing, Lt. Gibney, Lt. Nieko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Frahs, et al.
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Nelson
Defendant:
CPL. Benjamin Frahs, SGT. Travis Taylor, C.O. Dodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Paralegal Lifang et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Paralegal Lifang, Robbert Wheiler, Warden Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belcher v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00482
Plaintiff:
Camron Belcher
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Warden Jay Christionsen, Deputy Warden Timothy Mcay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoddard v. State of Idaho
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Lt. Daniel Paul Stoddard
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Reinkey, et al.
as 1:2021cv00454
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Lee McCormick
Defendant:
Brent Reinkey, LT. Christopher Hogan, Sgt. Justin Kimball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr et al v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr and Double Celled Close Custody Inmates of IDOC
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Chad Page, Amanda Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Bartlett et al
as 1:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Michael Barnes
Defendant:
Stephen Bartlett, Deputy Miller, Lt Sheperd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2021cv00255
Plaintiff:
John R Lopez
Defendant:
Jay Christensen, Lt. Nicodemus, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
