Cases 11 - 20 of 21
MAERSK INC. v. DACON LOGISTICS LLC
as 3:2012cv06670
Plaintiff:
MAERSK INC.
Defendant:
DACON LOGISTICS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
as 2:2012mc00145
Plaintiff:
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
Defendant:
T.J.D. INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MAERSK INC. v. VISION LOGISTICS
as 3:2011cv06813
Plaintiff:
MAERSK INC.
Defendant:
VISION LOGISTICS
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101
MAERSK INC. v. JRJ ENTERPRISES INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02755
Plaintiff:
MAERSK INC.
Defendant:
JRJ ENTERPRISES INC. and MACHUCA GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
MAERSK INC. v. EUROPEAN COFFEE, INC.
as 2:2010cv01770
Plaintiff:
MAERSK INC.
Defendant:
EUROPEAN COFFEE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAERSK INC. v. SAFORD-BAAH
as 2:2009cv05089
Plaintiff:
MAERSK INC.
Defendant:
KENNEDY SAFORD-BAAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
MAERSK INC. v. GLOBAL AMERICAN LINE
as 2:2009cv00688
Plaintiff:
MAERSK INC.
Defendant:
GLOBAL AMERICAN LINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S, v. CHARMI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
as 2:2009mc00017
Plaintiff:
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
Defendant:
CHARMI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
BRIDGE TERMINAL TRANSPORT, INC. et al v. MILLER et al
as 3:2008cv01624
Respondent:
MARK A. MILLER, DELIA BROOKE MILLER, SEA CASTLE CHASSIS and others
Petitioner:
BRIDGE TERMINAL TRANSPORT, INC., MAERSK CONTAINER SERVICE COMPANY, INC., MAERSK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRAIRIE MINES & ROYALTY LTD. et al v. MAERSK INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03560
Plaintiff:
PRAIRIE MINES & ROYALTY LTD. and COAL VALLEY RESOURCES INC.
Defendant:
MAERSK INC., MAERSK SOUTH AFRICA(PTY) LTD., MAERSK CANADA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
