Cases 11 - 20 of 46
LI v. TNC CONSTRUCTION INC., et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Defendant:
TNC CONSTRUCTION INC.,, SMJ CONSTRUCTION TECH LLC, STEVE KANG and others
Plaintiff:
HAIDONG LI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MIN v. BOKNUMCHER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv13760
Plaintiff:
BYUNG SAN MIN
Defendant:
BOKNUMCHER CORPORATION , BYUNG KWAN LEE , JOHN DOES 1-10 (said names being fictitious) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
VIRTU KCG HOLDINGS LLC et al v. LI
as 2:2017cv08296
Plaintiff:
VIRTU KCG HOLDINGS LLC and VIRTU AMERICAS LLC
Defendant:
MIN LI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
HAN et al v. WEMAKEPRICE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07077
Defendant:
WEMAKEPRICE INC. , I-SHOPLOG HOLDINGS INC. , I-SHOPLOG LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HEUNG JOO HAN and JONG MIN KOH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIM v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv01978
Plaintiff:
MIN YONG KIM
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION , JOHN DOE 1-10 (fictitious names) and ABC MAINTENANCE COMPANY 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KIM v. SGD DUBU LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01447
Plaintiff:
HWAN SUNG KIM and Jin Yong Shin
Defendant:
SGD DUBU LLC and JONG MIN NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LILY PRODUCE INC v. ASHLEY MARKETPLACE & CAFE INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01089
Plaintiff:
LILY PRODUCE INC
Defendant:
ASHLEY MARKETPLACE & CAFE INC. , CHEOL MIN KIM and MEMET YILDIRIM
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. KIM
as 2:2016cv05290
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
MIN JUNG KIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIBERTY PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, P.C. et al v. CHA, et al
as 2:2016cv04883
Plaintiff:
Liberty Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, P.C. and Benjamin Chang
Defendant:
TD BANKNORTH, N.A., Helen Cha , Bruce Park and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
