Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Hall v. Hudson et al
as 1:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Murray Hall, III
Defendant:
Rodney Hudson and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aitchison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
Richard Aitchison Aitchison, Miranda Anderson, Paul Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mercurio et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Brittany Paul, Deana Redden, Vincent Mercurio and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Erskine et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine, Lateef Dickerson, Matthew Hoskins and others
Defendant:
Truman Mears, Joseph Beck, Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
William Gould
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
Murray v. Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01590
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Defendant:
Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., Michael D. Clayman, Elizabeth Kwo and others
Murray v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01440
Petitioner:
Andre Murray
Respondent:
Robert May, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and Kathy Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
D'Arcy v. Shmidman et al
as 1:2021cv00862
Defendant:
Andrew Cooper, Sequential Brands Group, Inc., Aaron Hollander and others
Plaintiff:
Peter D'Arcy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
