Cases 11 - 20 of 29
DEMERI v. A CAND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67916
Plaintiff:
MARIE DEMERI
Defendant:
A CAND S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEBOWITZ et al v. EAGLE PICHER IND., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67923
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEBOWITZ and LILLIAN LEBOWITZ
Defendant:
EAGLE PICHER IND., INC., FLEXITALLIC GASKET CORP., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOGGINS v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv74886
Plaintiff:
HILDA H. LOGGINS
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT et al
as 2:2009cv71460
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVIS and CAROL DAVIS
Defendant:
KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT et al
as 2:2009cv71464
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVIS and CAROL DAVIS
Defendant:
KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT et al
as 2:2009cv71462
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVIS and CAROL DAVIS
Defendant:
KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT et al
as 2:2009cv71463
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVIS and CAROL DAVIS
Defendant:
KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT et al
as 2:2009cv71461
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVIS and CAROL DAVIS
Defendant:
KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, KELLOGG-BROWN & ROOT, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WRIGHT v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68819
Plaintiff:
LYNN R. WRIGHT, LYNN R. WRIGHT, LYNN R. WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VIGIL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68812
Plaintiff:
JOE S. VIGIL, JOE S. VIGIL, JOE S. VIGIL and others
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
