Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Brothers v. Neven et al
as 2:2017cv00641
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Dwight Neven and Brian Williams
Plaintiff:
Terrance D. Brothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isham v. Aranas et al
as 3:2016cv00696
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Linford, T. Manalang and others
Plaintiff:
Gayle Isham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2016cv00525
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Bergerton, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cranford v. State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv01755
Defendant:
Dr. R. Aranas, R. Carrillo, S. L. Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Keishawn Cranford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bannister et al
as 3:2016cv00399
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Isidro Baca, Bruce Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2016cv00401
Defendant:
R. Aranas, K. Hesse, Robert LeGrand and others
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodsky v. Wood et al
as 3:2016cv00264
Defendant:
R. Aranas, I. Baca, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Brodsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Baca et al
as 3:2016cv00001
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Isidro Baca, Sheryl Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Margaret Rudin v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2015cv02503
Defendant:
R. Aranas, J. G. Cox, Fergeson and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rudin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Aranas et al
as 2:2015cv02033
Defendant:
R. Aranas, Rence Baker, Leah Bothe and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donald Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
