Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Kemp v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21144
Plaintiff:
Robert H Kemp
Defendant:
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo US Holdings, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pettinga v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 9:2013cv80077
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk, Inc. , Metabolic Research Institute, Inc. and William A. Kay, M.D.
Plaintiff:
David Pettinga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Guimbard v. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv01670
Plaintiff:
Ana Guimbard
Defendant:
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc. and Moffitt Genetics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
VIERA v. ELITE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv22214
Defendant:
ELITE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC., MARIA REVOREDO, ANTOLIN BENITEZ and others
Plaintiff:
FERMIN R. VIERA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Novoneuron Inc v. Addiction Research Institute, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv23313
Plaintiff:
Novoneuron Inc
Defendant:
Addiction Research Institute, Inc. and Robert Rand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
