Cases 11 - 20 of 939
Ramos Aburto et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Ramos Aburto
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ramos v. L & J LLC d/b/a Red Line Auto & Tire et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Genaro Ramos
Defendant:
L & J LLC d/b/a Red Line Auto & Tire, Juan Arias and L & J Tires LLC doing business as Red Line Auto & Tire
Ramos v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramos
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Fordham
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
Ms. Anne L. Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv09539
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10851
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lacey Bell, Emalynn Bell, Alivia Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Ramos v. 123Tires and Service LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09146
Plaintiff:
Miguel Ramos
Defendant:
123Tires and Service LLC, Aharon Biton and Kijana Noel
Roca et al v. Central Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09115
Plaintiff:
Yini Sanchez Roca, Epifano Reyes Delgado and Lucia Ramos Duran
Defendant:
Central Transport, LLC and Fevrius Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
