Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Stephens v. Crews et al
as 8:2014cv02732
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Don G. Davis, Jamie Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Crews et al
as 8:2014cv02478
Plaintiff:
David Terence Stephens
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Don G. Davis, Jamie Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Crews et al
as 8:2014cv01904
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Don G. Davis, Jamie Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv01861
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Don G. Davis, Jamie Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Stephens v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-15680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, JAMIE RUBIO, Doctor and others
David Stephens v. Michael LaFay, et al
as 13-14194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HOWARD LAFAY, ROBERT WATTLES and AMANDA REGINA JACOBSON
Stephens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Don G. Davis, Jamie Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Wattles et al
as 6:2011cv00949
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
Robert Wattles, Amanda Regina Jacobson and Michael Howard Lafay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Wattles et al
as 6:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
Robert Wattles, Michael Howard LaFay and Amanda Regina Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Wattles et al
as 6:2011cv00246
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
Robert Wattles, Michael Howard Lafay and Amanda Regina Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
