Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant: WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified: BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee: ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant: JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae: ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
Buchanan v. Crow, et al
as 21-7042
Plaintiff / Appellant: FREEMAN BUCHANAN, III
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director, Department of Corrections, KEVIN DUCKWORTH, Director, Probation Parole, BLAINE NELSON, Warden and others
Johnson v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6093
Petitioner / Appellant: LAVONTE ANTONY'O JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director
In re: Starr
as 21-5065
Petitioner: DANIEL PAUL STARR
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director
Heddlesten v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-6080
Petitioner / Appellant: KENNETH R. HEDDLESTEN
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director
In re: Mongtomery
as 21-5061
Petitioner: JAMES EDWARD MONGTOMERY
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC
In re: White
as 21-7040
Petitioner: RICKEY WHITE
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections
In re: White
as 21-7034
Petitioner: In re: RICKEY WHITE
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections
In re: Davis
as 21-7030
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, director of Okla. Department of Corractions
Petitioner: ALVIN L. DAVIS, JR.
Knox v. Bowen, et al
as 21-6048
Defendant / Appellee: MARK BOWEN, LCF Administration, SCOTT CROW, Director of DOC and UNKNOWN LCF OFFICIALS
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONE LAMANDINGO KNOX

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?