Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Thomas Baccus, Jr. v. Board of Corrections, et al
as 12-35394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS BACCUS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY, CAROLING MELINIE and others
Nathan Diggs v. Board of Corrections, et al
as 11-36076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN DANIEL DIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, ROBIN SANDY, CAROLING MELINIE and others
Maynard et al v. Wamble-Fisher et al
as 1:2011cv00605
Plaintiff:
John Maynard, Lance Conway Wood, Doug Austin and others
Defendant:
Shell Wamble-Fisher and Ashley Dowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiore v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Robert J Fiore, II
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, CMS Health Management, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laird v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Anthony Laird
Defendant:
Johanna Smith, Brent Reinke, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Diggs
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00355
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Johanna Smith, Shell Wamble-Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baccus, Jr
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
James Earl Newman
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen, Joanna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beeson v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Milo Beeson
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
