Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Byrne v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09110
Plaintiff:
Denis Byrne, Sr.
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khan v. Amazing Store & Smoke Shop Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06148
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Aslam Khan
Defendant:
Amazing Store & Smoke Shop Inc., Yogi's Newstand and Mohammad Salim Sheikh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lugo v. Chhaya News Inc et al
as 1:2020cv05286
Defendant:
Ashok Patel, Chhaya News Inc doing business as Fresh Juice Bar, News at 31, Inc. doing business as Astoria Smoke Shop and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Lugo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fay et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10098
Plaintiff:
K.F., Kathryn Fay and Ian Fay
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., New York Smoke Shop, Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tarangelo v. Juul Labs Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv06131
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Shreeji Smoke Shop, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Tarangelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
