Cases 11 - 20 of 22
SoundExchange, Inc. v. LOC, et al
as 16-1159
Appellant:
SoundExchange, Inc.
Appellee:
Copyright Royalty Board and Librarian of Congress
Movant-Intervenor For Appellee:
iHeartMedia, Inc.
SoundExchange, Inc. v. Muzak LLC
as 16-7041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SoundExchange, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Muzak LLC
Young Money Entertainment LLC et al v. Universal Music Group et al
as 2:2016cv02096
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Michael Carter, Jr and Young Money Entertainment LLC
Defendant:
SoundExchange, Inc. and Universal Music Group, Inc.
SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. v. MUZAK LLC
as 1:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC.
Defendant:
MUZAK LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Intercollegiate Broadcasting v. LOC, et al
as 14-1262
Appellant:
Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc.
Appellee:
Librarian of Congress and Copyright Royalty Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
SoundExchange, Inc.
LIL' JOE RECORDS, INC. v. HOBBS et al
as 1:2014mc01254
Plaintiff:
LIL' JOE RECORDS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID HOBBS, ROGER MIZELL, DETRON BENDROSS and others
Garnishee:
SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Intercollegiate Broadcasting v. CRB, et al
as 14-1068
Appellant:
Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc.
Appellee:
Copyright Royalty Board and Librarian of Congress
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
SoundExchange, Inc.
SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC. v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC.
as 1:2013cv01290
Plaintiff:
SOUNDEXCHANGE, INC.
Defendant:
SIRIUS XM RADIO INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
SoundExchange, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board
as 13-1183
Petitioner:
SoundExchange, Inc.
Respondent:
Copyright Royalty Board
Sirius XM Radio Inc. v. SoundExchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02259
Plaintiff:
Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Defendant:
SoundExchange, Inc. and American Association of Independent Music
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
