Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Nakamoto v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 1:2020cv00243
Plaintiff:
Dolores Nakamoto
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-10, John Does 1-10, Doe Entities 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wideman v. Ige et al
as 1:2020cv00162
Defendant:
Clayton H.W. Hee, Kevin Rego, KFVE 5 and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Reginald Wideman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Anderson et al
as 1:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Edmund Hyun, Chief Susan Ballard, Dr. Bruce S. Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almond v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Sharon Almond
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Ted Sakai , State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esteban v. USA
as 1:2016cv00228
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ted S. Esteban
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tia v. Sakai et al
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Attorney General, The Department of, Dovie Borges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Harrington et al
as 1:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Grant Earl Hatcher
Defendant:
Scott Harrington, Sean Ornellas, Teresa Miike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Cambra v. Sakai et al
as 1:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
John De Cambra
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Shari Kimoto, Scott Jinbo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ted's Wiring Service, Ltd. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ted's Wiring Service, Ltd.
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Rideout v. Sakai et al
as 1:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Monty V. Rideout
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Al Beavers, Max Utani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
