Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Locke et al
as 3:2011cv01870
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity , Oceana, Inc. and Turtle Island Restoration Network
Defendant:
Gary F. Locke and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Salazar et al
as 3:2010cv00992
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Turtle Island Restoration Network
Defendant:
Ken Salazar and United States Fish And Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Turtle Island Restoration Network et al v. United States Department of State
as 4:2009cv05239
Plaintiff:
Turtle Island Restoration Network, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Mayport Village Civil Association Inc and others
Defendant:
United States Department of State and United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Turtle Island Restoration Network et al v. United States Department of State
as 3:2009cv05239
Plaintiff:
Turtle Island Restoration Network, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Mayport Village Civil Association Inc and others
Defendant:
United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Locke et al
as 3:2009cv02346
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Gary Locke, National Marine Fisheries Service, Ken Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 3:2007cv05109
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity, Center For Biological Diversity, Center For Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne and United States Fish And Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
