Cases 11 - 20 of 250
ZOUMPLIS v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67629
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE R. ZOUMPLIS
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARMER v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67641
Plaintiff:
LAURA H FARMER
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TREADWELL et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67646
Plaintiff:
LEON TREADWELL and ETHEL TREADWELL
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRUITT et al v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67485
Plaintiff:
DALLAS R. PRUITT and RUBY B. PRUITT
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILDS et al v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67557
Plaintiff:
CONLEY C. WILDS and ADA WILDS
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON et al v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67620
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. THOMPSON and JEANETTE L. THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHAFFER et al v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67558
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCHAFFER and ROASLIE M. SCHAFFER
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATTS et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67645
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE WATTS
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOKE v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67613
Plaintiff:
SADIE V. COOKE
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARRISH v. UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67612
Plaintiff:
ALISE PARRISH
Defendant:
UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
