Cases 11 - 20 of 24
IHC Health Services v. Verizon Wireless
as 2:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
IHC Health Services
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Bateman et al v. Jab Wireless
as 2:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bateman , Paul Lambert , Bruce Miller and others
Defendant:
Jab Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerardi v. Metropolitan Life Insurance et al
as 2:2013cv01089
Plaintiff:
Paul Gerardi
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance , Verizon Wireless and Verizon Wireless Health and Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Roach v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2013cv00427
Plaintiff:
Joydean Roach
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Muterspaw v. AT&T et al
as 2:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Allen Muterspaw
Defendant:
AT&T, Cricket Wireless, Sprint and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson Electronics v. Wireless Extenders
as 2:2012cv00442
Plaintiff:
Wilson Electronics
Defendant:
Wireless Extenders
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Parlant Technology v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, The et al
as 2:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Parlant Technology
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, The and Wireless Generation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Smith v. Jab Wireless et al
as 1:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith
Defendant:
Jab Wireless and Digis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne et al v. Jab Wireless et al
as 1:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
Mel Payne, Mel Payne, Ryan Saltzgiver and others
Defendant:
Jab Wireless and Digis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
