Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Schwartz v. Latch, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Scott Schwartz
Defendant:
Latch, Inc., Luke Schoenfelder, Robert J. Speyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Scott v. UserTesting, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
UserTesting, Inc., Andrew MacMillan, Darrell Benatar and others
TANG et al v. CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD. et al
as 1:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., HARBIN PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP HOLDING CO., LTD., HARBIN PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP CO., LTD. and others
Not Classified By Court:
DANIEL S. SCHECTER, PHV MICHAEL J. REISS, PHV NICOLE H. SPRINZEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Yellets v. Gu et al
as 1:2022cv00156
Nominal Defendant:
Hyzon Motors Inc. and Decarbonization Plus Acquisition Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lyle Yellets
Defendant:
George Gu, Craig Knight, Erik Anderson and others
Bishop v. Ni et al
as 1:2020cv01103
Defendant:
Zhehui Ni, Ren Hua Zheng, Caixuan Xu and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Bishop
Nominal Defendant:
HF Foods Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olsen v. Jurich et al
as 1:2018cv00516
Plaintiff:
Leonard Olsen
Defendant:
Lynn Jurich, Bob Komin, Paul Winnowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franchi v. IXYS Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01592
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
IXYS Corporation, Nathan Zommer, Uzi Sasson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In Re: Letter Request from Hong Kong
as 1:2014mc00212
Respondent:
Yuk-Kwan Wong
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
In re: Letter of Request from Hong Kong
as 1:2014mc00196
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Wong Yuk-Kwan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Brother Industries LTD v. Chi Kin Wong
as 1:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Brother Industries LTD
Defendant:
Chi Kin Wong
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
