Cases 11 - 18 of 18
PRATER v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., PA et al
as 2:2018cv08076
Plaintiff:
LESTER PRATER
Defendant:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., PA, TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., ZHONGSHAN USATA ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARROQUIN v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC et al
as 2:2018cv03013
Plaintiff:
FABIAN MARROQUIN
Defendant:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC, ZHONGSHAN USATA ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO. LTD., PRO QC INTERNATIONAL LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PINA v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2017cv07475
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PINA
Defendant:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC., ZHONGSHAN USATA ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO. LTD., PRO QC INTERNATIONAL LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Komertz et al v. Tristar Products, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02199
Plaintiff:
Catherine Komertz and Scott Miller
Defendant:
Tristar Products, Inc., Bed Bath and Beyond Inc., Zhongshan USATA Electric Appliance Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaney et al v. Tristar Products, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02200
Plaintiff:
Jeni Chaney and Brian Brunet
Defendant:
Tristar Products, Inc., Sam's West Inc., Zhongshan USATA Electric Appliance Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morales v. Tristar Products, Inc. et al
as 9:2017cv80938
Plaintiff:
Beth Morales
Defendant:
Tristar Products, Inc., ZHONGSHAN USATA ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO. LTD., PRO QC INTERNATIONAL LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05375
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN JOHNSON and JESSIE MAYBERRY
Defendant:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., ZHONGSHAN USATA ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO. LTD., PRO QC INTERNATIONAL LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWNES v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03712
Plaintiff:
MARIA BOWNES
Defendant:
TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. , ZHONGSHAN USATA ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO. LTD., PRO QC INTERNATIONAL LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
