Cases 11 - 20 of 3,699
Perfect Point EDM Corporation v. Scintam Engineering LTD
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Perfect Point EDM Corporation
Defendant:
Scintam Engineering LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Tribal Streetwear, Inc. v. Givenchy Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Tribal Streetwear, Inc.
Defendant:
Givenchy Corporation and Givenchy SA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement (jurisdiction)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
CrossFit, LLC v. Train HD, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Defendant:
Train HD, LLC a Georgia limited liability company doing business as The Gorilla Strong formerly known as The Gorilla CrossFit, The Gorilla CrossFit and Horace Davis
Plaintiff:
CrossFit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wareka v. Radiance Wellness and Beauty et al
as 3:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Radiance Wellness and Beauty, Kim Knox and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp, a California Corporation v. Windy City Paletas, a California Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp, a California Corporation
Defendant:
Windy City Paletas, Inc., Ecuamex Paletas, Inc., a California Corporation, Sky Limit Enterprises II, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
TOT Power Control, S.L. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
TOT Power Control, S.L.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0201 Petition to Compel/Stay Arbitration under an Insurance Contract
TOT Power Control, S.L. v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
TOT Power Control, S.L.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007 Petition to compel attendance before arbitrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
