Cases 11 - 20 of 635
JENKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY JENKINS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE KEVIN TATE, III
Defendant:
OKALOOSA CORRECTION INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, JASON THOMAS BRENES CATINCHI and JAQUELINE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
DA'VHON YOUNG
Defendant:
WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SEC'Y CASE MANAGEMENT ELECTRONIC CASE FILES NO 1
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
SEC'Y CASE MANAGEMENT ELECTRONIC CASE FILES NO 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, G ENGLISH, T DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, Natasha Barkley, Mike Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MUJICA v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LAURA ANNE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENDRICK v. WHISTLER et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Defendant:
RICHARD OLETO CHANG, DARLA KAY WHISTLER, JUSTIN AUSTIN TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMONT KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUFF v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HUFF
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
