Cases 191 - 200 of 12,267
Matuguina v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Brian John Matuguina
Respondent:
Warden Tyrell Davis, Boise Police, Ada Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BBlock v. Linze et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William BBlock
Defendant:
Linze, Copeland, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
SGT. Ramirez, Aaron Fodge, R. Findeisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matuguina v. City of Boise, et al.
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brian John Matuguina
Defendant:
City of Boise, Boise Police Department, Kip Paporello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Creech v. Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole, et al.
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Creech
Defendant:
Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole and Jan M. Bennetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holzer v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Connie Lois Holzer
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MacNeil v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dudley MacNeil
Defendant:
Judge Harris, Judge Butler, Twin Falls County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galvan v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jodi Galvan
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ranck et al v. Ranck
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Allen Ranck
Defendant:
Dolores J Ranck and Suzanne R. Gremp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
