Cases 221 - 230 of 840,970
TILFORD v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04990
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
DACIA TILFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TRAVIS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04991
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TRAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04992
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
CARRIE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARVILLE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04996
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARVILLE
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04997
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK WALKER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ABSHIRE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04999
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
KELLI ABSHIRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CALLOWAY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05000
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
MELISSA CALLOWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SPERLING v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05001
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
PAUL D SPERLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUGHES v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05002
Plaintiff:
WENDY HUGHES
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
