Cases 21 - 30 of 140
ALLEN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01197
Plaintiff:
ISAAC KELVIN ALLEN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GOMEZ v. KELLY et al
as 1:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
ISAAC D. NARVAEZ GOMEZ
Defendant:
JEDIDAH M. HUSSEY , JAMES COMEY , REX W. TILLERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1631
ALLEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2016cv00708
Plaintiff:
ISAAC KELVIN ALLEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BONILLA v. POWER DESIGN INC et al
as 1:2016cv00642
Defendant:
POWER DESIGN INC, CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC and DDK ELECTRIC, INC.
Plaintiff:
BONILLA and ISAAC BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AL-TAMIMI et al v. ADELSON et al
as 1:2016cv00445
Defendant:
ADELSON, SHELDON ADELSON, NORMAN BRAMAN and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TAMIMI, BASSEM AL-TAMIMI, SUSAN ABULHAWA and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MIRIAM ADELSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01671
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATHAWAY v. US PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01094
Petitioner:
EUGENE CARL HATHAWAY
Respondent:
US PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BLUTH et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2015cv00665
Plaintiff:
NETHANIEL CHAIM BLUTH , SHOSHANA ROSALYN BLUTH , EPHRAIM BLUTH and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC and SYRIAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00279
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
