Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Kane v. Saavedra et al
as 2:2012cv01731
Defendant:
Mrs. Cipollini, Mrs. Collins and Dr. Rubin Saavedra
Plaintiff:
Shannon Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Malay et al
as 3:2012cv00357
Defendant:
Arvin, Baker, Dewis and others
Plaintiff:
Inginio Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chipeta v. Kane
as 3:2011cv00903
Plaintiff:
Pachaco Chipeta
Defendant:
Edward Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Digilio v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 2:2011cv01866
Respondent:
Attorney General, Community Corections Manager Phoenix, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Petitioner:
William Anthony Digilio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kane v. American Oil & Gas Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01489
Defendant:
American Oil & Gas Inc., Andrew P Calerich, Nick DeMare and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declarato
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00363
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. United States of Amercia
as 2:2008cv00194
Respondent:
United States of Amercia
Movant:
Kane Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Patterson v. Drakulich et al
as 2:2007cv01297
Plaintiff:
Kane Patterson
Defendant:
Paul Drakulich and Pamela Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. BlueCross/BlueShield of Texas et al
as 2:2007cv01352
Plaintiff:
Kane Norton
Defendant:
BlueCross/BlueShield of Texas and Centex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
