Cases 21 - 30 of 46
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. ARQUB et al
as 1:2011cv06178
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
RAFAT ARQUB and MAIKEL BESHAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. FUENTES
as 2:2011cv05096
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
YULISSA FUENTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. SCHETTER BROTHERS REAL ESTATE LLC et al
as 1:2011cv03793
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
SCHETTER BROTHERS REAL ESTATE LLC and TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. PRUDEN TOOL AND DIE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv02026
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
PRUDEN TOOL AND DIE COMPANY, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. CHIGOM, LLP
as 2:2011cv01227
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
CHIGOM, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. ATKINS et al
as 2:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
HARRIET ATKINS, KA-NOT TAVERN, INC. and AND UNKNOWN TENANTS/OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
U.S. Bank National Association ND v. Apex Mortgage et al
as 1:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association ND
Defendant:
Apex Mortgage, Jock Perkins, Jane Doe Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. BLUITT et al
as 2:2010cv04645
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
JIMMY D. BLUITT, UNKNOWN TENANTS/OCCUPANTS and HOLLISTYNE C. BLUITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. EVANS et al
as 2:2010cv04507
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
JAMES C. EVANS, WINNIFRED MARTIN and UKNOWN TENANTS/OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. ARQUB et al
as 1:2010cv03868
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
RAFAT ARQUB, MAIKEL BESHAY, COLISEUM PIZZA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
