Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Fairfield Sentry Limited v. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. et al
as 1:2010cv06568
Plaintiff:
Fairfield Sentry Limited
Defendant:
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and Beneficial Owners of the Accounts Held In the Name of Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. 1-1000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. v. Banca MB S.p.A.
as 1:2010cv01002
Plaintiff:
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
Defendant:
Banca MB S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In B, et al v. Opportunity Fund
as 09-5190
In Re:
In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Acct # 8870792 In Name Of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd. and Any & All Funds & Assets In Any And All Accounts Held At Ubs Ag & Ubs Securities Llc, Stamford, Ct By Or Containing Any Interest Held By Or Controlled By Daniel Valente Dantas And/or Veronica Valente
Respondent - Appellee:
Opportunity Fund
Intervenor - Appellee:
Tiger Eye Investments, Ltd. and Opportunity Unique Fund
Interested Party - Appellant:
United States of America
In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In B, et al v. Opportunity Fund
as 09-5164
In Re:
In re: Any & All Funds & Assets, In Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Acct # 8870792 In Name Of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd. and Any & All Funds & Assets In Any And All Accounts Held At Ubs Ag & Ubs Securities Llc, Stamford, Ct By Or Containing Any Interest Held By Or Controlled By Daniel Valente Dantas And/or Veronica Valente
Respondent - Appellee:
Opportunity Fund
Intervenor - Appellee:
Tiger Eye Investments, Ltd.
Interested Party - Appellant:
United States of America
In re: Any and all funds, et al
as 09-5065
In Re:
In re: Any and all funds or other assets, in Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Account #8870792 in the name of Tiger Eye Investments Ltd., Any and all funds or other assets, in any and all Accounts held at UBS AG and UBS Securities LLC, Stamford, CT, by or containing any interest held by or controlled by Daniel Valente Dantas and/or Veronica Valente Dantas, Opportunity Group, Opportunity Fun and Any and all funds or other assets, in the following accounts at Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A.: Account #6459648 in the name of Brown Brothers Harriman (Luxembourg) S.C.A. as Custodian for Opportunity Fund; Account #6459747 in the name of Bro
Petitioner - Appellant:
United States of America
Respondent - Appellee:
Opportunity Fund
Intervenor - Appellee:
Tiger Eye Investments, Ltd.
Cardenas et al v. 233 Broadway Owners, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00681
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cardenas and Edith Cardenas
Defendant:
233 Broadway Owners, LLC, 59 Maiden Lane Associates, LLC., 63 Wall Street Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Axion Power International, Inc. et al v. Mercatus & Partners, Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv11493
Plaintiff:
Axion Power International, Inc., William Ahearn, Tracy Ahearn and others
Defendant:
Mercatus & Partners, Ltd., MF Global, Inc., MF Global, UK Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kopcza v. 101 Barclay Street et al
as 1:2007cv05396
Plaintiff:
Michal Kopcza
Defendant:
101 Barclay Street, The Bank of New York Company, Inc., One Wall Street Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Naranjo et al v. Verizon New York, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00066
Defendant:
New Libert y Plaza LP (Owner), Ann Taylor Stores Corporation, 140 West Street (Verizon Building) and others
Plaintiff:
Blanca Naranjo and Angel Naranjo
Undetermined:
Office of New York State Attorney General Eric. T. Schneiderman, Board of Managers of Hudson View East Condominium and Hudson View East Condominium
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Cieslak v. 222 Broadway, LLC. et al
as 1:2006cv13479
Defendant:
Zeckendorf Realty, LLC, WFP Tower D. Co., G.P. Corp., Ann Taylor Stores Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Romuald Cieslak
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
