Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Fraley v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 7:2019cv00067
Plaintiff: William R Fraley
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2019cv00358
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Darlene Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dry v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 5:2019cv00366
Defendant: Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wanda Dry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mcgaha v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00020
Plaintiff: Carolyn Sue Mcgaha
Defendant: Sofradim Products SAS, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNair v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00553
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael McNair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv00132
Plaintiff: Sandra Moore
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc., Covidien LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shropshire v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00374
Plaintiff: Jennifer Shropshire
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Littke v. Davol, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00786
Plaintiff: Anthony Littke
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mayfield et al v. London Women's Care, PLLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00019
Plaintiff: Melissa Mayfield and Robert Mayfield
Defendant: London Women's Care, PLLC , Thomas Mechas , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thurman v. Davol Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00206
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Thurman
Defendant: Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?