Cases 21 - 30 of 36
McManus v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2017cv11836
Plaintiff:
Dena M. McManus
Defendant:
C.R. Bard , Davol, Inc. , Medtronic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stipelcovich v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2017cv09656
Plaintiff:
Richard Stipelcovich
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2017cv06075
Plaintiff:
Jason Bruce
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Davol, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Theda Banks
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodrigue et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05920
Plaintiff:
Debra P. Rodrigue and Mark A. Rodrigue
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00160
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sherita Reed and Stephen Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peterson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00528
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carol Peterson and Richard Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rice et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00240
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn R Rice and Roy R Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marigny v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01696
Plaintiff:
Karen Marigny
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naquin et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02821
Plaintiff:
Simon Naquin and Crystal Naquin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
