Cases 21 - 30 of 256
MAROUSIS v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv10941
Plaintiff:
IRENE MAROUSIS
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05263
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED, C.R. BARD INC., C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DENICOLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEAHI et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03148
Plaintiff:
EARL PEAHI and MARY PEAHI
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLAND v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02518
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN BLAND
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEARNE et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00259
Plaintiff:
MILDRED HEARNE and NATHAN HEARNE
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEAD v. C.R. BARD et al
as 2:2019cv17179
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C.R. BARD
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA HEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAHL et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17057
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
LISA M. BAHL and TIMOTHY M. BAHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLAYTON v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17059
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, BARD PERIPHERAL VASULAR, INC. (a subsdiary and/or division of defendant C.R. BARD, INC.), C. R. BARD, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN D. CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWFORD et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv15830
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD CRAWFORD and NANCY CRAWFORD
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. C.R. BARD INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05482
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC. and C.R. BARD INC.
Plaintiff:
CODY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
