Cases 21 - 30 of 5,446
FERGUSON et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65868
Plaintiff:
ALLAN EDWARD FERGUSON and NANCY ANN FERGUSON
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALACHNWICZ et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66132
Plaintiff:
JOHN J ALACHNWICZ , REGINA ALACHNOWICZ and ARLENE J ANDEREGG
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION , FEDERAL-MOGUL CORP. , CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66020
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. TAYLOR and IRMA TAYLOR
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASPER et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65867
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. GASPER and MARY ANN GASPER
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KINDLE v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66032
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. KINDLE
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65866
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES HAMILTON and RUTHANNE HAMILTON
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURNS v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66033
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE BURNS
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEINEKING et al v. CAREY CANADA et al
as 2:2011cv65038
Plaintiff:
RONALD F. HEINEKING and GENEVIEVE HEINEKING
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA and THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WYERS et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv66021
Plaintiff:
DELMAR D WYERS and DELORES WYERS
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWRENCE et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC.
as 2:2011cv65865
Plaintiff:
HARRY D. LAWRENCE and PATRICIA E. LAWRENCE
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
