Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07091
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HUDSON RIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC, METROPOLITAN CONSOM, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
OPTIKA EYEWEAR, INC. et al v.KINNELON CLEANERS, et al
as 2:2011cv04418
Plaintiff: OPTIKA EYEWEAR, INC. , KINNELON EYECARE and KOSTAS PATELLIS
Defendant: KINNELON CLEANERS, SUNRISE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUALCASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GRASSO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05299
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: HARRY GRASSO, PATRICIA GRASSO, TOWNE FIVE CLEANERS, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
TRUSTEES OF THE LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING WORKERS and ALLIED INDUSTRIES HEALTH FUND, WORKERS UNITED et al v. MONMOUTH CLEANERS, LLC D/B/A NORTH AMERICAN LAUNDRY
as 2:2010mc00013
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING WORKERS and ALLIED INDUSTRIES HEALTH FUND, WORKERS UNITED and TRUSTEES OF THE LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING WORKERS AND ALLIED INDUSTRIES RETIREMENT FUND, WORKERS UNITED
Defendant: MONMOUTH CLEANERS, LLC D/B/A NORTH AMERICAN LAUNDRY
SHIN v. IVY DRY CLEANERS & LAUNDERERS et al
as 2:2009cv00375
Plaintiff: JONG KUCK SHIN
Defendant: IVY DRY CLEANERS & LAUNDERERS, LIVINSTON CLEANERS INC., HONG JIN CHUNG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
EMPIRE OVERALL DRY CLEANERS, INC.
as 2:2008cv05936
Plaintiff: EMPIRE OVERALL DRY CLEANERS, INC. and DEBORAH CRAFFEN
Defendant: G&K SERVICES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SK USA CLEANERS, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008mc00131
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: SK USA CLEANERS, INC.
SCHNEIDER v. ROSEN et al
as 1:2007cv05569
Plaintiff: ELIAS L. SCHNEIDER
Defendant: ANDREW R. ROSEN and WRIGHT CLEANERS
Intervenor: BOROUGH OF WRIGHTSTOWN
Counter Claimant: ANDREW R. ROSEN and WRIGHT CLEANERS
Counter Defendant: ELIAS L. SCHNEIDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMEN, et al v. AMERICAN THERMOPLAST, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1998cv04781
Plaintiff: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , ADMINISTRATOR, NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and KASPER DISPOSAL SERVICE
Defendant: AMERICAN THERMOPLASTICS CORP. , CADILLAC PLASTICS GROUP, INC. , CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Counter_claimant: COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION , COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION OF CONNECTICUT, INC. , OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY , MENNEN COMPANY , WARNER LAMBERT COMPANY, INC. and others
Third_party_plaintiff: AMERICAN THERMOPLASTICS CORP. , CADILLAC PLASTICS GROUP, INC. , CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Third_party_defendant: AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC. , ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. , BP EXPLORATION & OIL INC. and others
Plaintiff_consolidated: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant_consolidated: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY , DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter_claimant_consolidated: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM, INC. and FALCON MANUFACTURING , INC.
Movant: COOPERATIVE DISPOSAL CO. and M & H SERVICES
Fourthparty_plaintiff: HOECHST CELANESE CORP.
Fourthparty_defendant: STATEWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Third_party_plaintiff_consolidated: COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY and EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Third_party_defendant_consolidated: ELASTIMOLD CORPORATION , NATIONAL STARCH & CO and THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?