Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Roush v. State of Colorado
as 5:2010cv03237
Petitioner:
Charles Elmer Roush
Respondent:
State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Colorado Natural, LLC v. Intercontinental Meat Trading, Inc.
as 2:2010cv02609
Plaintiff:
Colorado Natural, LLC
Defendant:
Intercontinental Meat Trading, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BNSF Railway Company et al v. South Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad et al
as 5:2010cv04060
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company , Cimarron Valley Railroad, LC , Kansas and Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Joan Wagnon and Mark S. Beck
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
BNSF Railway Company et al v. Wagnon et al
as 5:2009cv04082
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company, Cimarron Valley Railroad, LC, Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Joan Wagnon and Mark S. Beck
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503 Railroad Revitalization Regulatory Reform
Williams-Colorado v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01102
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc., Dollar General Partners, Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Velma Williams-Colorado
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Colorado Interstate Gas Company v. Wright et al
as 5:2009cv04031
Plaintiff:
Colorado Interstate Gas Company and Colorado Interstate Gas Company
Defendant:
Thomas E. Wright, Joseph F. Harkins, Michael C. Moffet and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BNSF Railway Company et al v. Wagnon et al
as 5:2007cv04068
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company, Cimarron Valley Railroad, LC, Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Joan Wagnon and Mark S Beck
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503 Railroad Revitalization Regulatory Reform
Bingham v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03112
Petitioner:
Michael W Bingham
Respondent:
Kansas Department of Corrections and Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
