Cases 21 - 30 of 4,479
Riley-Henderson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03442
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn L. Riley-Henderson
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reun v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Nhanh Kathy Reun
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wagner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03353
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Wagner
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clemans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Clemans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Zargorski v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03333
Plaintiff:
Lea Marie Zargorski
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Santiago v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03249
Plaintiff:
Edwin Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Peacock v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Peacock
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03214
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jahinsha v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03192
Plaintiff:
Ms. Nahrain Jahinsha
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
