Cases 21 - 30 of 6,233
SOLIS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56381
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TANTI et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58193
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SLOOP et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56029
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KIMBALL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56038
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PERRY et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56905
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GAVIN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56008
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MAGNO et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58231
Plaintiff:
JULIO M MAGNO , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
TEMPLE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59122
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RIDDLE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55961
Plaintiff:
BENNIE E RIDDLE , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WALL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv55976
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
