Cases 21 - 30 of 33
PONCE et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03332
Plaintiff:
EVAN HUBBARD, DANIEL ERWIN, JOHN HANNA and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03059
Plaintiff:
THELMORE CUMBY, AUSTIN DYER, SETH SOUTHERLAND and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv80110
Plaintiff:
David Martinez
Defendant:
Bart Thompson, Robert Faircloth, John Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEATO v. ELITE POWER NUTRITION, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv20339
Defendant:
ELITE POWER NUTRITION, LLC and DAVID MARTINEZ
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL BEATO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Martinez v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv00343
Petitioner:
Jose David Martinez
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Mark Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv00175
Petitioner:
Jose David Martinez
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Mark Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davila v. Utopia Home Care, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv02428
Plaintiff:
Maria Davila
Defendant:
Utopia Home Care, Inc. and David Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Francois v. Domo Japones, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv23246
Plaintiff:
Lara Francois
Defendant:
Domo Japones, LLC, Amir Ben-Zion and David Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Martinez v. H. Goicoechea, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv21689
Plaintiff:
David Martinez
Defendant:
H. Goicoechea, Inc. and Hugo Goicoechea
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Martinez v. United States of America
as 0:2008cv61223
Plaintiff:
David Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
